In a 4-3 majority, the Maryland Supreme Court declined to expand employment protections for members of the LGBTQ+ community, concluding that the two statutes at issue do not explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
The plaintiff, John Doe, a data analyst at Catholic Relief Services (CRS), sued his employer after CRS abruptly terminated his legal spouse’s health benefits after more than a year of coverage when the organization discovered the couple’s homosexual marriage.
Benefits of a Digital Membership
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
Already have an account? https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmxhdy5jb20vMjAyMy8w...