The year 2025 has been an eventful one for employment law, and 2026 may well bring further important changes in this space.
Unlock Access to Premier Legal Insights with Law.com
Join the Law.com community today!
- Explore the entire Law.com network.
- Enjoy free access to one article from the Law.com network every 30 days*.
- Subscribe to curated newsletters for the latest updates, analysis, and expert commentary.
- Search across a spectrum of legal topics to find exactly what you’re looking for.
- Set up alerts on any search topics you choose.
Already a part of the community? Sign In Now.
Is one article a month not enough? Subscribe today to unlock premium access to all the in-depth analysis and breaking news on critical legal issues from Law.com.
*May exclude premium content.
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge W. Scott Hardy declined to follow Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly’s report, which recommended that the court grant AstraZeneca’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiff Tammy Siko’s amended complaint after she claimed she was fired for failing to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
Because sexual harassment does not serve any business purpose, most circuit courts have interpreted Title VII to require a showing that the harasser was either “aided in accomplishing the tort by the existence of the agency relationship” or that the employer was negligent in letting the employee commit the tort. When a third-party harasses an employee, most courts invoke the same negligence theory to...
Read Full Story:
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipwFBVV95cUxORDFLdFhJVVVVcy02TE5FenNh...