The US Supreme Court refused to insulate airlines from California’s meal and rest break requirements, leaving intact a ruling that Alaska Airlines Inc. said will mean “nationwide tumult” for the industry.
The justices, without comment, let stand a damage award against Virgin America Inc., now part of Alaska, in a class action suit by California-based flight attendants. Alaska contended that a federal airline law supersedes the California rules.
Alaska and the industry say the appeals court ruling will force airlines to add extra crew to many flights at a time companies are already suffering from a labor shortage. The lack of a definitive answer from the court doesn’t resolve a conflict between state and federal laws, and will result in a patchwork of costly and conflicting regulations, according to Airlines for America, the lobbying group for major US carriers.
“We expect that other cases involving state meal-and-rest-break laws will present the US Supreme Court with similar legal questions,” the trade group said in a statement Thursday. “It will be increasingly clear that these laws affect airlines prices, routes and services and should be preempted.”
The suing flight attendants say the industry has overstated the impact of the ruling, issued by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. The case centers on flights within California.
Alaska “can easily avoid all of the supposed catastrophic effects of the decision below through the simple expedient of...
The Kroger Sued for False Advertising case is raising fresh concerns about transparency in supermarket meat departments, as Animal Outlook accuses the retail giant of misleading in-store marketing...