Amazon workers won class certification Monday in a lawsuit alleging they should have been paid for new hire events (Martinho v. Amazon.com).
The lead plaintiff received an offer for a nonexempt position at a California fulfillment center, contingent on the completion of certain activities at new hire events. Specifically, she was required to complete her I-9 paperwork, take a badge photo, undergo a background check, watch a welcome presentation and, at a second event, complete a drug test.
The first event took about 50-60 minutes, she said, and the second took less than 60. She alleged California law and labor code required that she be paid for that time.
Amazon asked the court to dismiss the claims, arguing the worker was not an employee at the time but rather a “contingent” hire.
A judge agreed with Amazon with respect to the drug testing, background check and I-9 form. Drug testing is part of the application process, she said, and completion of the I-9 and the initiation of the background check function similarly.
Taking a photograph and watching the presentation, however, were different, the judge concluded, allowing those claims to proceed. The badge grants employees access to Amazon facilities and timekeeping, the judge explained; job applicants, or nonemployees, do not receive such privileges. Similarly, Amazon uses the presentation to show new hires what to expect on the job, saving time on employees’ first day of work.
Therefore, she concluded, the plaintiff was...
Top News The Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, says the Federal Government’s high-level delegation currently in the United States is actively confronting and corre...