When whistleblowers speak out, they make Australia a better place.
Regrettably, in August, the High Court of Australia declined to hear an appeal by tax office whistleblower Richard Boyle.
Boyle will now face trial - and potential jail time - after blowing the whistle on unethical debt recovery practices at the Australian Taxation Office.
Boyle’s whistleblowing sparked several independent inquiries which vindicated allegations of wrongdoing within the tax office. But Boyle faces prosecution – not for his public whistleblowing, but for his actions gathering evidence prior to raising concerns internally.
Boyle’s High Court bid came after the South Australian Court of Appeal ruled in June that he was not protected under federal whistleblowing laws. The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s ruling, which found that only the actual act of whistleblowing was immune from prosecution, not preparatory actions – no matter how closely related to the whistleblowing itself.
Those decisions, which the High Court has now declined to review, significantly limit the protections available to Australian whistleblowers. The Human Rights Law Centre had advocated for a wider approach which would better protect whistleblowers, joining the earlier appeal as a friend of the court.
We are calling on the Albanese Government to urgently reform our whistleblower protection laws and ensure whistleblowers like Richard Boyle are not imprisoned.
This was a heartbreaking day for Boyle. His case...
Dive Brief: A federal judge has ordered CVS to pay $948.8 million in penalties and damages in a whistleblower case alleging that the company’s Omnicare division illegally charged the U.S. governm...