A supportive manager and past remote work were enough to keep the case alive
A US appeals court restored a disabled worker's accommodation claim, sending it back to a lower court for another look.
On July 24, 2026, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals partly sided with a longtime New York City employee who says his agency mishandled his request to change where he worked.
The employee, who has chronic respiratory illness, had worked for the city's tax agency for years. During the pandemic he worked from home. In March 2022, the city set a hybrid schedule: three days remote, two days at a Manhattan office. He asked instead to spend his in-office days at a Staten Island location closer to home, saying the commute and the Manhattan office worsened his breathing. The agency refused.
A trial judge dismissed his entire case. On appeal, the outcome was split.
The part HR teams should note is the accommodation claim. The appeals court found the worker had done enough to move forward. Three pleaded facts mattered: he had worked from home through the pandemic, the agency later let him keep two remote days a week, and his own manager backed his request for the Staten Island office. Together, the court said, those made it plausible he could do his job with the accommodation he wanted.
The trial judge had asked for too much, too soon. As the court put it, the rules do "not require a plaintiff to plead evidence." An employee does not have to spell out every essential job function to get...
Executive Summary What’s new: The Seventh Circuit affirmed dismissal of an outsider’s qui tam action under the False Claims Act, outlining a potential path to dismissal where a relator lacks ins...