They said masks were "functionally useless." The judges had a blunter word for the claim
A federal appeals court has backed an employer's religious-accommodation process, tossing a covid discrimination suit and confirming that intent, not disagreement, decides these claims.
On July 10, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a group of commercial aviation workers who objected, on religious grounds, to their employers' pandemic rules on vaccination, testing, and masks.
The setup is one many HR teams will recognize. Atlas Air, a commercial airline, and Flight Services International, which staffs its flights, required Covid-19 vaccination unless a worker obtained a religious or medical exemption. Those who did had to wear a mask on the job and test once a month. The complaint did not allege that anyone lost their job, though it said some workers were assigned to less desirable, lower-paying flights.
The workers argued that the vaccine push, and then the mask-and-test alternative, created a hostile work environment under Title VII, the federal law that bars religious discrimination at work. The court disagreed on every point.
Its reasoning is what HR leaders will want to sit with. To win a hostile-work-environment claim, the court said, "the plaintiff is required to prove that the defendant had a discriminatory intent or motive." The workers offered none. The policy, the court noted, cut the other way: Atlas Air exempted...
Welcome to Reality Check, NewsGuard’s nonpartisan newsletter that tracks the false claims and conspiracy theories that shape our world — and who’s behind them. Please support us by becoming a premi...