An arbitrator already said the firing lacked just cause - and a judge just let that in
An old arbitration ruling has come back to haunt a transit employer, helping push a worker's discrimination and retaliation case toward trial.
On July 17, 2026, a federal magistrate judge recommended that the US District Court for the District of Columbia reject the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's bid to end the lawsuit before it reaches a jury.
The employee, a longtime detective in WMATA's transit police department, had sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, claiming the agency discriminated against her because of her sex and race and retaliated against her for complaining. Over roughly two years she filed three charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The court trimmed the case down before letting it move ahead. Poor performance reviews, it found, were not "adverse actions" because the worker could not link them to any real harm, such as lost pay or a missed promotion. Gripes about a clumsy reinstatement - no keys, no radio, delays - looked more like "petty slights or minor annoyances," the ruling said, quoting the Supreme Court.
What did survive was the worker's 2014 suspension and firing. WMATA said it dismissed her for refusing to cooperate with an internal investigation into roughly 30 sensitive case files she kept in her car trunk. The agency argued she "is the only officer ever known to have refused" to take part in such a probe.
The...
OREM — A Utah psychiatrist charged with making false claims for medical benefits, is now accused of accessing child sex abuse material while awaiting trial. Thomas Eugene Draschil, 49, of Orem, wa...