Employees sometimes use "hostile work environment" to describe a workplace they consider unfair, offensive or unpleasant. A supervisor may be rude or overly demanding. Co-workers may make inappropriate comments or engage in behavior that creates friction. But difficult or objectionable workplace conduct does not automatically create an unlawful hostile work environment.
That distinction is important for HR. Employment law gives "hostile work environment" a specific meaning, but HR should not wait for conduct to cross the legal threshold before addressing it. Understanding what can make workplace conduct legally significant can help HR evaluate complaints, identify warning signs and determine when intervention is warranted.
A recent California appellate decision illustrates the serious end of that spectrum.
See also: When AI becomes a weapon: The harassment risk HR leaders might miss
What Decloedt tells employers
In Decloedt v. RadNet Management, Inc., a former employee alleged that a co-worker repeatedly harassed him because of his sexual orientation, including by making derogatory remarks and engaging in threatening and unwanted physical conduct. He said he reported the conduct to management and HR but that no corrective action was taken. He asserted claims under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), including hostile work environment and sexual harassment claims.
The case reached the California Court of Appeal over whether the employee's claims could be...
Read Full Story:
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilgFBVV95cUxQLVpBMmZ3SUhPemVPS3Q1dzc1...