David Scott’s $3,000-an-hour rate may not raise eyebrows on Wall Street, but it hit a wall in U.S. federal court last week when Northern District of California Judge Beth Labson Freeman called the Scott+Scott partner’s billing request “patently unreasonable” to settle a $68 million Google Assistant privacy class action.

A Subscription is Required to Access this Content.

Subscribe to Law.com Today for:

• Strategic Intelligence - Business of law market insights from experts and analysts across all major legal markets
• Integrated Insights - Compass and Radar context built right into articles.
• Personalized Experience - Tailored homepage content and curated newsletters.
• Smart Search & Alerts - Powerful search functionality and real-time updates.

Learn more

Already a subscriber? Log in here

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)

NOT FOR REPRINT

2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Caroline Byrne

The 2025 Global 200 exposes the rapid rise of the Global 50 and Global 5, signaling a profound shift in the legal landscape, one where power is increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few and survival is the price of admission.

Once fast-growing legal markets can quickly fall out of favor, as law firms...

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiiwFBVV95cUxNdDJ6MmhZUWJqR05Zang0MkpV...