• A dental assistant for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) alleged she faced whistleblower retaliation and constructive discharge after reporting safety concerns.
• The Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court’s decision that individual supervisors cannot be liable for retaliation under state law.
• The Court of Appeal overturned the lower court’s dismissal of the retaliation claim against the state and the CDCR.

Farzana Chaudhry, a dental assistant who worked at the California Medical Facility (CMF), which provides dental care for prison inmates, sued the state, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), and three individual supervisors for retaliation under California’s Government Claims Act, California Labor Code section 1102.5, and the California Whistleblower Protection Act (Government Code Section 8547), which protects whistleblowers who report alleged improper government activities. She also sued for constructive discharge in violation of public policy.

Chaudhry alleged CMF retaliated against her in July 2018, October 2019, and multiple times in 2020 and 2022, terminated her employment after reinstatement by the State Personnel Board (SPB), and terminated her employment again a month after her return in January 2022. In August 2022, the day she returned to work after having again been reinstated by the SPB, she involuntarily resigned.

Chaudhry alleged that, in retaliation for her reports of unsafe working...

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizwFBVV95cUxPN2VOcTIyZ1o4NXJvbU9zYkxE...