We invite you to review our newly-posted November 2023 California Employment Law Notes, a comprehensive review of the latest and most significant developments in California employment law. The highlights include:

• Company That Hired Competitor’s Employee Was Not Entitled To Arbitrate Claims
• Disability Discrimination Claim Was Properly Dismissed On Summary Judgment
• Employee’s Attorney’s “Pervasive Incivility” Justified $460,000 Reduction In Fees
• Employees Were Properly Awarded $7.2 Million

…

Posted in #MeToo, Age discrimination, Anti-SLAPP, Appeal, Appellate Court, Arbitration, Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration provision, Attorney's Fees, base compensation, Breach of Contract, California Code of Civil Procedure, California Labor & Employment Law, California Labor Code, claim, Class Action, Class Actions, compensation, complaint, Coronavirus, Court of Appeal, Court of Appeals, COVID-19, deadline, Defamation, Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion, EEOC, Employee Benefits, employer, employer misconduct, Employment Policies, Federal Jurisdiction, FEHA, Gender discrimination, Gender Identity, Harassment, increased compensation, judgment, Labor Code violations, Meal Periods and Rest Breaks, misconduct, PAGA, Retaliation, serious and willful misconduct, Sexual Harassment, Sexual orientation discrimination, Trade Secrets, Verdict, Wage and Hour, Wage Statements, Workers Compensation

Once Again, Employer Loses Right To Arbitrate By Failing To Timely Pay Arbitration Fees

By...

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vY2FsZW1wbG95bWVudGxhd3Vw...