×
Tuesday, September 22, 2026

California worker seeks compensation for injury allegedly arising ... - HRD America

Medical evaluator determines 65% permanent disability

The applicant, who worked for Sutter Connect Human Resources, alleged that she suffered an industrial injury to her neck, bilateral wrists, and bilateral arms on a cumulative basis as a result of performing repetitive job duties.

The applicant in the case of Armbrust vs. Sutter Select; State Compensation Insurance Fund claimed that she suffered the injury during the course of her employment with the defendant employer. The parties’ agreed medical evaluator determined 65% permanent disability.

The parties, anticipating a mandatory settlement conference, exchanged emails with settlement discussions about a potential compromise and release.

The trial tackled the issues of the injured body parts, the permanent and stationary date, permanent disability, apportionment, liability for self-procured medical treatment, attorney fees, and the existence of a settlement agreement.

The workers’ compensation administrative law judge found that the emails did not amount to a valid and enforceable settlement agreement or compromise and release under sections 5002 and 5003 of California’s Labor Code.

The applicant filed a petition for reconsideration challenging the judge’s decision. She argued that the defendant could not unilaterally withdraw from a settlement agreement simply because it did not fulfill its obligation to perform the contingencies that it agreed to perform.

The applicant asserted that she and the defendant entered into...



Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMimwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5oY2FtYWcuY29tL3Vz...