A North Carolina federal district court denied Forefront Dermatology, S.C.'s emergency motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to enforce a noncompete agreement against a former dermatologist, finding that the company failed to show immediate and irreparable harm would result before the dermatologist could be heard, as the potential loss of patients was not sufficiently imminent to warrant ex parte relief.
This story was produced by Bloomberg Law Automation and edited by Bloomberg Law staff.
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
President Trump, who for years has sowed doubt about the security of American elections, is scheduled to give a primetime address Thursday night on election integrity. The remarks come as his war ...