A California federal district court ruled that Senior Care Pharmacy Services, Inc. isn’t entitled to summary judgment on a pharmacist’s whistleblower retaliation claims under the False Claims Act and its state law equivalent, finding that a genuine dispute exists whether the pharmacy’s reasons for firing him—his alleged deficient performance and harassment complaints by female coworkers—were pretext to retaliate for his protected complaints to management about illegal conduct.

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5ibG9vbWJlcmdsYXcu...