Deep Dive
Reporter
The fate of an emerging strategy plaintiff’s firms use to advance employer-sponsored benefit plan mismanagement cases is at stake as the US Supreme Court tackles a multifaceted debate over a decades-old conflict-of-interest law.
Cornell University workers recently won their bid for high-court review of a US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision affirming the dismissal of claims that their 403(b) plan engaged in prohibited transactions with service providers. At issue is a single, vague clause in the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act that defines with whom plans are prohibited from transacting.
ERISA lists any “person providing services ...
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.
A viral video shows two women being detained by Polk County deputies for ICE at a Florida hospital. The Polk County Sheriff's Office states that social media posts about the incident contain false...