Confidentiality Limited: When Anonymous Whistleblowers Must Be Identified - Filion Wakely
Bottom Line
In Jarvis v The Toronto-Dominion Bank (“Jarvis”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (“Court”) ordered that a complainant’s identity be disclosed in the context of a wrongful dismissal lawsuit, despite promises of confidentiality extended during a workplace investigation. The employer, TD Bank, claimed it had just cause to terminate the plaintiff employee based on anonymous complaints and a confidential investigation into those complaints. Although TD Bank promised the whistleblower and complainants that their identities would remain confidential, the Court ordered it to disclose the unredacted complaints and investigation report.
This case reveals a tension between the public interest in transparency, and the potential chilling effect of revealing the identity of whistleblowers or complainants in the workplace.
Plaintiff Demands Unredacted Complaint and Investigation Report Copies
Mr. Jarvis (“Jarvis” or “Plaintiff”) worked at TD Bank. TD Bank (“Defendant”), received anonymous complaints associated with Jarvis’s alleged misconduct. After investigating the complaints, TD Bank terminated Jarvis’s employment for just cause, and the Plaintiff then sued TD Bank, alleging wrongful dismissal.
After TD Bank defended against Jarvis’s wrongful dismissal claim by asserting that it had just cause to terminate his employment, Jarvis sought to inspect the complaints and investigator’s report that formed the basis of his termination. TD Bank delivered the requested...
Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipgFBVV95cUxQQ204dER0cFBLTlNaM1Y1VWFy...