The Connecticut Supreme Court has disagreed with a plaintiff who wanted to expand the term “supervisor” to include employees who can’t take “tangible employment actions,” but who can exert control over the day-to-day conditions of a subordinate’s work.

In an employment discrimination case, the plaintiff argued that the term “supervisor,” as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court, was too narrow under the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act, but the state Supreme Court disagreed.

Want to continue reading?
Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!

Benefits of a Digital Membership

• Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
• Access to the entire ALM network of websites
• Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
• Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
• Search by a wide range of topics

Already have an account? https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMie2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmxhdy5jb20vY3RsYXd0...