A 2022 law could have kept her in court - but the calendar worked against her
A former Netflix employee wanted her sexual harassment case heard in open court. The timing of her complaints sent it to private arbitration instead.
When does a workplace dispute officially begin? For HR teams, that used to be an academic question. A federal appeals court just made it a practical one - and got there by looking at Netflix.
On July 8, 2026, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a former Netflix employee must take her sexual harassment claims to private arbitration rather than a public courtroom. The reason was not the strength of her allegations. It was the calendar.
Here is the setup. The employee joined Netflix in May 2017 and signed an agreement with an arbitration clause covering all employment disputes. She alleges she then faced a "sexualized employment environment" and repeated harassment, and that when she raised concerns she was "only to be ignored and discarded." In December 2021, Netflix fired her, citing failure to follow its COVID-19 vaccination policy. She alleges the real reason was retaliation for her complaints.
None of that has been tested at trial. The court assumed her account was true for one narrow purpose: deciding where the fight belongs.
That hinged on the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, or EFAA. The 2022 law lets employees pull sexual harassment claims into open court even after signing an arbitration...
Gets 15 months in federal prison A former New York City correction officer was sentenced Tuesday to 15 months in federal prison after admitting he falsely claimed that he suffered injuries on the j...