As previously reported (here, here and here), courts in Delaware, the once favored “employer-friendly” jurisdiction, have increasingly scrutinized and refused to enforce noncompete agreements. In recent cases, Delaware courts have continued this trend, this time focusing on forfeiture-upon-competition provisions in equity or profit incentive agreements that also include affirmative restrictive covenants. Two of these cases are Delaware Chancery Court noncompete cases. Following on the heels of the Delaware Supreme Court’s affirmation of the employee choice doctrine, three trial courts have held that forfeiture of equity results in a failure of consideration such that the affirmative restrictive covenants are unenforceable. The practical effect of these cases is to force companies to choose between forfeiture or affirmative restrictions when crafting their equity contracts with employees. We can expect further developments in Delaware noncompete law and its implications for drafting incentive units and noncompete agreements under Delaware law, as two of the three cases are now on appeal. Recent cases are discussed below.
Payscale v. Norman
In Payscale Inc. v. Norman, 2025-0118-BWD, 2025 WL 1622341 (Del. Ch. Apr. 4, 2025), the parties entered into multiple incentive agreements that included restrictive covenants and granted nontransferable profit interest units — 25% on a date...
Rod Stewart has hit out at US President Donald Trump over his false claims about British troops in Afghanistan. The rock star has urged UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Reform UK leader Nigel Fa...