States are taking different regulatory approaches to AI mental health tools in response to concerns about chatbots providing inaccurate or potentially dangerous advice. Laws and pending legislation in some states restrict AI from providing or advertising itself as therapy, while others focus on data protections, disclosures, and requirements for patient consent.
Concerns about AI chatbots providing wrong or potentially dangerous advice have prompted legislative activity in multiple states, following documented cases of chatbots responding inappropriately to mental health-related prompts and allegations that interactions with AI were a contributing factor in multiple suicides. AI chatbots have also been documented giving false or misleading responses to health-related questions, including cases where chatbots reinforced users’ inaccurate beliefs rather than correcting them.
As about one in six (16%) adults, including three in ten (28%) adults under 30, say they have used AI tools for mental health information or advice in the past year, states have begun to use regulations to address these concerns, with different approaches:
Governor Makinde might be alone in his NLNG dividend disagreement with FG because he doesn't support President Tinubu re-election like other governors - Gadu Watch full interview: https://youtu.