Where a defendant employer was awarded summary judgment on claims of discrimination on the basis of age, race and national origin brought by a plaintiff who was terminated from his job during a reduction in workforce, the judgment should be affirmed because (1) the lower court correctly held that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case of age, race or national origin discrimination and (2) the employer articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for his termination that the plaintiff did not show to be pretext for unlawful discrimination.
Complete access to news articles on milawyersweekly.com is available to Michigan Lawyers Weekly subscribers who are logged in. Subscribers may login at the login tab below. Others may join our audience with a subscription today.
The presidency has denied claims of withholding 250 billion in Nigeria LNG Limited (NLNG) dividends for each state in the country. At the 2027 Budget Stakeholders’ Consultative Engagement held at...