In a case that reminds us that derogatory content can offend even if it's popular, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in Sharp v. S&S Activewear, LLC ("Sharp") that music with sexually derogatory and violent content, played constantly and publicly throughout the workplace, can create a hostile or abusive environment, constituting sexual discrimination.
The case involved several former employees who complained that their company played explicit songs by the artist Too $hort which contained, "highly offensive" lyrics that "glorified prostitution" and "Stan" by Eminem which violently details a pregnant woman being forced into a car trunk and driven into water to be drowned. These songs were played regularly through commercial-strength speakers. In some instances, the speakers were put on forklifts and driven around the warehouse. The complaining employees alleged that the music encouraged abusive conduct by male employees.
Importantly — despite receiving "almost daily" complaints, S&S' management and employees embraced the music, calling it motivational, and continued to allow it to be played until the complaints escalated into a lawsuit.
After initially losing at the lower court level on the ground that the music was equally offensive to all genders, the federal Court of Appeals ultimately held that "sexually graphic, violently misogynistic" music constitutes workplace harassment and can serve as the basis for a Title VII claim.
What's the lesson here?...
Councillor who spread false rumours apologises and says it is “important we do not point finger of blame at the wrong person” The former deputy crime commissioner of Hampshire has hit out after bei...