STRASBOURG, France (CN) — Europe’s top rights court reversed course on Tuesday, finding a symbolic fine for a whistleblower was still a violation of his freedom of expression.
The European Court of Human Rights overturned its own 2021 decision and found that the fine issued by a Luxembourg court against ex-PricewaterhouseCoopers employee Raphael Halet for releasing documents as part of the so-called "LuxLeaks" financial scandal could have a chilling effect on the media.
Inspired by a documentary involving a leak from another PwC employee, Halet used the email address [email protected] to send an investigative journalist the tax returns of companies like Amazon, Ikea and the iTunes branch of Apple in 2012.
Both Halet and French journalist Edouard Perrin were charged before a Luxembourg court with theft over the 16 tax returns. As a journalist, Perrin was eventually acquitted, but Halet was fined 1,000 euros ($1,200 at the time) plus a symbolic sum of one euro in compensation.
In May 2021, the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights concluded the punishment was "a relatively mild penalty that would not have a real chilling effect on the exercise of the applicant’s freedom or that of other employees."
Halet appealed and the court’s Grand Chamber agreed with him Tuesday, finding he should be considered a whistleblower rather than a thief.
“The public interest in the disclosure of that information outweighed all of the detrimental effects arising from it,”...
Blow the whistle, get paid. A Justice Department bounty program that incentivizes employees to blow the whistle on their employers could lead to more whistleblowing as the Trump administration inte...