A fresh ruling tests how far the Supreme Court's Ames decision really reaches for employers
A fired Texas teacher tried to use a 2025 Supreme Court discrimination ruling to revive his case. The Fifth Circuit said no.
On June 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a Title VII claim brought by Joe Bravo, a former Dallas Independent School District teacher. The ruling tests how far the Supreme Court's Ames decision actually reaches, and the answer matters for any employer defending a discrimination claim in the Fifth Circuit.
The facts are short. The District fired Bravo after six students complained that he made racially insensitive remarks in the classroom. Bravo, who is Mexican-American, sued, arguing the District had discriminated against him because of his ancestry, in violation of Title VII.
He never got to a jury. The trial court granted the District summary judgment, a ruling that ends a case before trial when one side lacks enough evidence, because Bravo could not identify a similarly situated comparator. That idea is central to discrimination law: to keep a claim alive, an employee usually has to point to someone outside their protected class who did substantially the same thing and was treated better. Bravo couldn't, so his case ended.
On appeal, he changed tack. He argued that Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, decided by the Supreme Court in 2025, had scrapped the comparator requirement. Ames struck down a rule...
A video shows immigrants setting fire to the Basilica of St Michael in Bordeaux, France. False. The video shows a tent on fire beside the church. AAP FACTCHECK - A video showing smoke rising near ...