The government's primary civil tool for addressing health care fraud is the False Claims Act (FCA). Most FCA cases are resolved through settlement agreements in which the government alleges fraudulent conduct and typically the settling parties do not admit liability. Depending on the facts and circumstances presented, OIG will usually pursue one of the following approaches when settling a health care fraud case: (1) exclusion; (2) heightened scrutiny; (3) integrity obligations; (4) take no further action; or (5) in the case of a good faith and cooperative self-disclosure, release 1128(b)(7) exclusion with no integrity obligations. OIG’s Risk Spectrum illustrates these approaches. For more information on how OIG evaluates risk to the Federal health care programs and the criteria the OIG considers in evaluating exclusions in False Claims Act cases, see OIG’s April 18, 2016 notice.
A City of Duquesne police officer is suing Rostraver, its former police chief and a detective, claiming they arrested him without probable cause and cost him a job at the Elizabeth Township Police...