Case sends strong warning to employers about risks of relying on contractual interpretations courts have rejected
A recent IBM wrongful dismissal case sends a strong warning to Ontario employers about the risks of relying on contractual interpretations that courts have already rejected. The message: if you dig in on an untenable contract interpretation that deprives an employee of their proper entitlements, and you force them to trial despite clear case law to the contrary, you may end up paying dearly in legal costs as well as damages.
In this decision, an Ontario court ordered IBM to pay more than $215,000 in legal costs in addition to the $682,000 in wrongful dismissal damages, after finding the company forced a dismissed employee to proceed to trial despite existing case law undermining its position.
The decision highlights an important principle in Ontario employment law: employers who take unreasonable litigation positions or ignore established precedent may face serious financial consequences beyond wrongful dismissal damages alone.
The IBM wrongful dismissal case highlights how Ontario courts may penalize employers that rely on unreasonable or outdated interpretations of employment contracts. In this decision, IBM was tound to have advanced a contractual position that conflicted with established case law, forcing a long-service emploee to proceed to trial. The court ultimately awarded significant wrongful dismissal damages ad order IBM to pay over $215,000 in legal...
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has filed two civil lawsuits alleging a Minneapolis bakery, a now-defunct nonprofit and others submitted false claims worth millions of dollars to the Minne...