A California appellate court on Monday ruled that a state presumption doctrine on who controls an employee’s work barred an injured worker from suing a company that contracted with his employer to perform work.
SMC Contracting Inc. hired Tyco Simplex Grinnell Inc. to install an automatic fire sprinkler system for a development in South Lake Tahoe. Tyco employee Tommy Ray McCullar arrived at work and found the floor covered in ice. While trying to use a ladder on the ice, Mr. McCullar slipped and suffered injuries, according to McCullar v. SMC Contracting Inc., filed in the Court of Appeal for the 3rd District of California in Sacramento.
Mr. McCullar filed suit against SMC, seeking damages. A trial court judge found the “Privette doctrine” applied and granted summary judgment for SMC. That doctrine is a presumption that a hirer of an independent contractor delegates to the contractor all responsibility for workplace safety.
In affirming, the appeals court explained the Privette doctrine is based on the idea that a hirer typically has no right to control the manner of a contractor’s work and hires a contractor precisely because of the contractor’s greater ability to perform the work safely and successfully.
“Although we accept, for purposes here, that SMC retained control over Tyco’s work, we are not persuaded that SMC negligently exercised its retained authority in a manner that affirmatively contributed to McCullar’s injuries,” the court said.
SMC’s conduct may have...
New Delhi (Vishvas News): A video is being widely shared on social media, purportedly showing Indian Army Chief General Dhiraj Seth dancing with a woman. The video is being shared with the claim t...