Staff counted down her last minutes while colleagues watched from a meeting
An employee at LVMH refused one meeting - and a federal appeals court ruled that refusal could amount to a protected act under anti-retaliation law.
The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 21 partially overturned a lower court's dismissal of retaliation claims against LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., finding a former in-house attorney had plausibly alleged that turning down a settlement discussion with her new supervisor counted as protected opposition under Title VII, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.
The worker had alleged years of sexual harassment by a facilities director starting in 2015, including an alleged physical assault in her office. She raised it internally. The complaint alleged the company looked the other way - an internal investigator allegedly called it "just a misunderstanding," and a senior executive allegedly told her there are "certain things we have to put up with."
She filed a state court lawsuit in 2019. It was compelled to arbitration.
Then things shifted. In July 2022, a new chief legal officer joined LVMH as her direct supervisor. He requested a one-on-one meeting to "discuss or negotiate a settlement" of her pending claims. She declined.
According to the complaint, what came next was preapproval requirements on speaking engagements, exclusion from key matters, and dismissive treatment in meetings. On...
To display this content from YouTube, you must enable advertisement tracking and audience measurement. From the show 3 min Donald Trump’s UN address was packed with claims that are misleading, ...