In 2025 Meta secured an emergency ruling banning former executive Sarah Wynn-Williams from promoting her book, criticizing the company, or even discussing it at home, under threat of fines of up to $50,000 per statement. “This ruling affirms that Sarah Wynn-Williams’s false and defamatory book should never have been published,” Andy Stone, a Meta spokesman, posted on social media on March 12, 2025.
An American Arbitration Association emergency arbitrator issued the ruling on March 13, 2025, the day Careless People was published in the UK. Rather than finding any of Wynn-Williams’s claims defamatory, the order relied on a non-disparagement clause in her severance agreement with Facebook. It said nothing about whether her allegations were true or false. Notably, such contractual enforcement created a notable precedent for how corporations can suppress former employees without facing the evidentiary burden of defamation proceedings.
By choosing a contractual enforcement path over a defamation claim, Meta avoided any obligation to prove Wynn-Williams’s account was false. Private arbitration also kept the process away from public scrutiny, a sharp contrast to how such cases typically unfold in open court. Critics and legal observers noted that this approach allowed Meta to neutralize a public critic while bypassing the evidentiary standards courts would otherwise require. How tech companies use employment agreements to silence whistleblowers has since become a growing...
A federal judge on Monday largely blocked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from carrying out civil immigration arrests at several Manhattan immigration courthouses, after government lawyer...