×
Monday, June 22, 2026

More Developments in the Constitutional Challenge to the False Claims Act, and Appellate Consideration of the Scope of the Antikickback Statute - Law.com

Prior issues of this column have addressed a broad range of healthcare enforcement topics, but one subject has arisen more than any other: the hotly disputed question of whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (FCA) violates the U.S. Constitution.

A Subscription is Required to Access this Content.
Subscribe to Law.com today for:

  • Exclusive Reporting - Fast, authoritative coverage and sharp analysis.
  • Integrated Insights - Compass and Radar context built right into articles.
  • Personalized Experience - Tailored homepage content and curated newsletters.
  • Smart Search & Alerts - Powerful search and real‑time updates.

Already a Subscriber? Log In.

Questions? Contact an Account Specialist at [email protected] | 1-855-808-4530 (Americas) | 44(0) 800 098 386009 (UK & Europe)

Continue Reading

U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon ruled that three current and former JPMorgan employees met the pleading standard to bring a case under Section 406(a)(1)(C) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, a law barring fiduciaries from engaging in transactions that harm an employment benefit plan.

This article covers recent legal issues: the ongoing debate over FCA constitutionality, with the Sixth Circuit denying an appeal in TriHealth, and the DOJ’s indictment of Done Global and Mindful Mental Wellness for illegally distributing Adderall via telehealth. Despite individual convictions, the companies face charges, indicating the government’s focus on enforcement...



Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAJBVV95cUxOMDUtVm1IcTBMSmtEVVlRUlZf...