In the latest in a series of recent decisions taking a broad reading of protections against retaliation for whistleblowing, the MSPB has said that the law applies to employees of “non-appropriated fund” entities outside the Defense Department.
Unlike the large majority of federal positions, those jobs are not funded by appropriations from Congress but rather from fees charged for the services. Most of those are in the Defense Department in functions such as post exchanges and clubs although they exist in a number of other agencies, as well.
Case No. 2023 MSPB 25 involved one of those, the Agriculture Department’s National Finance Center, which is funded by the fees it charges for providing payroll services to other agencies. An employee filed an “individual right of appeal” contending that he suffered workplace reprisal after disclosing that a charge to a client agency was too low and that the difference could be made up only by over-charging other agencies or by putting a financial strain on the NFC itself.
The MSPB said that because the case presented the “unique situation of an NAF employee who is not employed by a military exchange or instrumentality, we take this opportunity to clarify that NAF employees of non-military instrumentalities may file IRA appeals.” It said that while the law specifically excludes employees of NAF functions in the Defense Department, there is no such exclusion for such employees in other agencies.
The MSPB then overturned a hearing officer...
A deadline buried in a March 26 executive order, which aims to curb federal contractors' purported discrimination related to diversity, equity and inclusion practices, is drawing attention from fed...