In a case involving kidnapping and murder charges, the Supreme Court of California said that the fact that the victim’s aunt was a county court employee did not, by itself, warrant recusing the entire district attorney’s office.

In the case of People v. Ramirez, the defendant was convicted of various crimes under the California Penal Code, including carjacking, kidnapping with intent to commit robbery, and first-degree murder in connection with the same victim.

The trial court imposed a total consecutive term of over 20 years. The defendant filed a motion to disqualify the Kern County District Attorney’s Office because the victim’s aunt was a supervising clerk for the Kern County Municipal Court. The defense alleged the following:

• The aunt regularly attended the defendant’s trial;
• It was inappropriate for the aunt to supervise the clerk in the courtroom that handled matters relating to this case;
• The close working relationship between the District Attorney’s Office and the Municipal Court compromised the impartiality of the prosecutor’s office in this matter;
• The District Attorney’s Office and the Municipal Court were in the same building.

The aunt testified that, while she generally supervised the clerk in that courtroom, she made arrangements for another supervisor to oversee the issues arising from the defendant’s proceedings. She said that she briefly spoke to the clerk about an unrelated juvenile case, heard no information about the defendant’s case, and reviewed...

Read Full Story: https://www.hcamag.com/us/specialization/employment-law/murderer-kidnapper-wa...