A growing series of ERISA class action complaints has placed employer-sponsored voluntary benefit programs squarely within the fiduciary crosshairs.[1] These actions, filed against major plan sponsors and nationally recognized benefits brokers, do not challenge core medical plan design or employer contributions. Instead, they target accident, critical illness, cancer and hospital indemnity benefits, i.e., programs long treated by many employers as peripheral, employee-paid offerings.
The complaints advance a unified and increasingly familiar theory: once voluntary benefits are offered through an ERISA-governed welfare plan, they are subject to ERISA’s full fiduciary framework. Employers that exercise discretion over carrier selection, pricing, broker compensation, or plan administration, and brokers that influence or control those decisions, may be held to the statute’s exacting standards of prudence and loyalty. According to the plaintiffs, failures in process, rather than outcomes alone, caused plan participants to pay excessive and unreasonable premiums, while brokers and other service providers reaped outsized financial benefits.
ERISA does not condition fiduciary responsibility on whether a benefit is employer-paid or employee-paid. The statute focuses instead on discretion and control. Where an employer sponsors an ERISA welfare plan and retains authority over benefit offerings, service providers...
Amid the ongoing conflict involving Israel, the United States and Iran, several rumours about Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu have begun circulating widely on social media. Multiple viral posts have...