In a personal injury case involving the multifactor Galvao test, used to evaluate whether a worker who negligently caused a plaintiff’s jobsite injury was a “borrowed employee” of the plaintiff’s own employer, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that application of the test is presumptively for a jury to decide.
The justices said the court itself should not resolve the borrowed-employee issue unless the evidence on the factors is so one-sided that it warrants judgment in favor of the moving party as a matter of law.
Want to continue reading?
Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!
Benefits of a Digital Membership
- Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
Already have an account? https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMilgFodHRwczovL3d3dy5sYXcuY29tL25qbGF3...