He had a lawyer, an accountant and a union rep - the court was unimpressed
A senior lecturer signed a deal to leave Swinburne University of Technology. Then he spent two years trying to undo it.
The Federal Court of Australia on September 21, 2026, found that a deed of release - an agreement in which both sides agree to walk away and not sue each other - between the university and the academic was valid and enforceable, rejecting all four grounds the lecturer raised to challenge it.
The backstory starts in mid-2024. The lecturer, a senior academic in Swinburne's law school, had been raising concerns about grade distribution, grade inflation and teaching standards since 2019. By July 2024, Swinburne had started a formal disciplinary process, alleging serious misconduct.
The allegations, set out in a letter dated July 29, 2024, covered conduct stretching back to 2022. A second letter followed on August 14, concerning a department meeting. The lecturer denied wrongdoing. He maintained the allegations were being used against him because he had objected to grade inflation or possible grade manipulation.
The National Tertiary Education Industry Union stepped in. It lodged a dispute on the lecturer's behalf and pushed back on Swinburne's characterisation of the conduct as serious misconduct. A meeting between the parties on September 2, 2024, did not resolve the standoff.
On September 5, the union raised the idea of a mutual separation agreement with the university.
The following...
By MELISSA GOLDIN President Donald Trump made myriad false and misleading claims during his address to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, many of which he has repeated frequently thro...