The judge below called it a 'radical power imbalance' - the appeals court saw it differently
An Arizona appeals court ruled that paying workers more than other jobs does not make the arbitration waivers they sign unfair.
In a decision filed on August 18, 2026, the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed a lower court and sent two injured workers into arbitration, finding the clauses they signed were enforceable even though no one had explained what arbitration meant.
Both workers were inmates at the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry who took jobs at Hickman's Egg Ranch (Hickman) through a prison labor program. Both were hurt on the job. One slipped and fell while cleaning cages on her second day. The other had his right thumb crushed by a machine. Each sued Hickman for negligence rather than go to arbitration.
Both had signed a one-page "Volunteer Agreement and Waiver" during orientation. The document set out its arbitration clause in bold, underlined text and warned, in capital letters directly above the signature line, that signing meant giving up the right to sue. A Hickman representative never explained how arbitration worked.
A Maricopa County judge sided with the workers and refused to send the cases to arbitration. The judge found a "radical power imbalance" because Hickman paid $4.85 an hour against roughly $.10 an hour for other prison jobs. That gap, the judge said, left inmates so "highly incentivized" to sign that Hickman could...
By Kate Yandell ANALYSIS — Studies have shown no connection between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and increased risk of miscarriage. Despite this, Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Johnso...