Guidelines send a clear & coordinated signal: non-compete clauses must be narrowly tailored, properly justified & supported by fair compensation.
For international companies operating in China, non-compete agreements remain a key instrument to protect trade secrets and preserve competitive advantage. But recent judicial and regulatory developments show that authorities are increasingly unwilling to accept broad or routine post-employment non-compete clauses without clear justification. Enforcement now depends more on striking the right balance between legitimate corporate interests and employees' rights. These changes raise compliance expectations and increase litigation risks. Understanding the new framework is essential to ensure enforceability and avoid disputes.
In September 2025, Chinese authorities issued guidance to clarify the legal boundaries of non-compete restrictions. The Supreme People's Court's Judicial Interpretation II guide courts on how they should assess post-employment non-compete obligations. Shortly thereafter, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security released the Compliance Guidelines for Enterprises Implementing Non-Compete Agreements (the "Guidelines"), which set out more detailed standards for employment practices. Although the Guidelines are advisory rather than binding, they reflect prevailing regulatory thinking and are likely to be persuasive in labor arbitration and court...
A Metropolitan Police officer has been banned from policing after a jury found she falsely claimed she had been sexually assaulted during a stop by a plain clothed officer. PC Lauren Evans reporte...