Armenia's policy of usurping historical and cultural monuments continues. As always, this time it starts with the appropriation of the ancient Albanian cultural history. In fact, it is not surprising that a nation without any history and culture, raids the history of others. The issue is not only Armenia's appropriation of historical monuments, but also its unfair treatment towards them.
In a comment for Azernews, Doctor of Philosophy in History Kerem Mammadov said that the churches were built in two shapes - Catholic and Orthodox, and it is totally wrong to attribute them to Armenian, Russian and Byzantine architectures.
"In the Caucasus, there are two types of churches: the Monophysite and Diophysite churches. The Monophysite churches are distinct from others with one throne that was placed on the side pointing to Jerusalem. However, in Diophysite temples, two thrones were placed, and Armenians belong to the Diophysit sect," the historian said.
A question arises here. If the Armenian state belongs to the sect of Diophysites, and the churches of the South Caucasus belong to the sect of Monophysites, how can they accept Albanian churches? By what fact Armenians appropriate churches and mosques?
It is a tradition of Armenia to convey such false claims to the public. Appropriating the Albanian churches by David Babayan, the adviser of the so-called state's head, and moreover, blaming Azerbaijan, which is a pattern of respect and care for all cultures, is a clear example of...
Images of the Whitegate fuel protests earlier this month were altered to make it appear gardaí were violent towards protesters. The AI-doctored images were shared widely online, including by inter...