The Department of State Services (DSS) has said its decision to prosecute online publisher and politician, Omoyele Sowore, was based on the perceived security implications of a social media post in which he described President Bola Tinubu as a criminal.
Sowore is currently facing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja for allegedly making false claims against the President through posts on his X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook accounts. The DSS contends that the post constituted a threat to national security.
An official of the DSS, Cyril Nosike, gave the explanation on Tuesday while being cross-examined by Sowore’s lawyer, Marshall Abubakar.
The defence had played a video in court showing President Tinubu promising to tolerate criticism and name-calling, and asked why the DSS still proceeded with the charge.
In response, Nosike maintained that the agency acted because of the security implications of Sowore’s post, not necessarily on behalf of the President.
He said the video referenced by the defence was recorded during a state visit to Brazil, but admitted he was not present at the time and did not personally record it.
Nosike told the court that he downloaded the video from Sowore’s social media page and did not know when or by whom it was recorded. He also confirmed that he did not interview President Tinubu or obtain any statement from him concerning the video or the alleged defamatory post.
The witness further admitted that the DSS did not receive any formal...
The Department of State Services (DSS) has said its decision to prosecute online publisher and politician, Omoyele Sowore, was based on the perceived security implications of a social media post i...