A business crisis does not give an employer a blank check to reduce employees’ workdays, cut their take-home pay, and later defend the measure as “management prerogative.
That is the central lesson of the Supreme Court En Banc ruling in Andro T. Bacani, et al. v. Fiber Textile Manufacturing Corp., et al., G.R. No. 271518. The decision is one of the most consequential recent Philippine labor law rulings on flexible work arrangements, reduced workdays, worker rotation, DOLE notice requirements, and constructive dismissal.
The Court recognized that employers may face genuine operational difficulties. It acknowledged that reduced work schedules may sometimes be a more humane alternative to retrenchment or closure. But it drew a firm line: when a flexible work arrangement reduces employee pay or benefits, the employer must comply with legal safeguards. Otherwise, what appears to be a temporary business measure may become an unlawful diminution of pay and, ultimately, constructive dismissal.
For employers, HR officers, accountants, corporate directors, business owners, and employees, this ruling should be read not merely as a labor case, but as a compliance manual written in jurisprudential form.
The petitioners were production workers of Fiber Textile Manufacturing Corp., a textile manufacturing company operating a factory in Meycauayan, Bulacan. They were employed as folding operators, chemical mixers, color men, receivers, and dyeing operators, earning 380.00 per day. They...
By MELISSA GOLDIN and CALVIN WOODWARD, Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) — After President Donald Trump said he would accept the results of his party’s midterm rout, many of his loyalists followed ...