On June 15, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana that bilateral arbitration agreements governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) may require arbitration of California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims on an individual basis only.
In early July, Moriana, the named plaintiff-employee at the center of Viking River Cruises, filed a petition for rehearing with the Court. Moriana argued that the Court’s opinion went beyond the federal question presented and involved the unbriefed issue of state-law contract interpretation and statutory construction that exceeded the Court’s authority.
On August 22, 2022, the high court denied the request for rehearing and issued a final judgment, leaving intact the Court’s analysis of the severability language in Viking River Cruise’s arbitration agreement, as well as the Court’s analysis of statutory standing under PAGA.
While the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion is now final, the California Supreme Court has granted review in several cases pertaining to employment arbitration agreements and PAGA. Through these cases, the California Supreme Court may shed additional light on when a plaintiff maintains statutory standing under PAGA.
The enforceability of arbitration agreements in California continues to evolve in other areas as well. Notably, recently the Ninth Circuit withdrew its opinion pertaining to Assembly Bill (AB) 51 and granted a panel rehearing of the appeal. AB 51 is California’s law...
Immigration enforcement have made arrests in connection with a suspected criminal network believed to be behind dozens of fake asylum claims from people pretending to be gay. It follows a BBC inve...