• Appeals courts split over scope of whistleblower protections
• 6th Circuit revived neurologist's claim he was blacklisted after firing
• Hospital said ruling would be devastating for employers

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it would not resolve a split among federal appeals courts over whether federal law protects whistleblowers who face retaliation after they leave their jobs.

The court declined to review a decision from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reviving a neurologist's claim that a Michigan hospital blacklisted him and destroyed his career after he was fired for filing a whistleblower complaint.

The 6th Circuit's March 2021 decision created a split with the 10th Circuit, which has held that the federal False Claims Act does not shield former employees from retaliation.

Jason Marcus of Bracker & Marcus, who represents plaintiff David Felten, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Neal Katyal of Hogan Lovells, who represents William Beaumont Hospital.

Felten sued William Beaumont in 2010 for allegedly paying kickbacks to doctors for referrals. He later amended the lawsuit to claim that the hospital retaliated against him by preventing him from...

Read Full Story: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/scotus-wont-decide-if-whistleblower-...