A federal appellate court Friday weighed a constitutional challenge Friday to False Claim Act’s provisions that allow private whistleblowers to bring civil lawsuits on the government’s behalf—a case being closely watched for its possible impact on future FCA litigation and potential for Supreme Court review.

Unlock Access to Premier Legal Insights with Law.com
Join the Law.com community today!

• Explore the entire Law.com network.
• Enjoy free access to one article from the Law.com network every 30 days*.
• Subscribe to curated newsletters for the latest updates, analysis, and expert commentary.
• Search across a spectrum of legal topics to find exactly what you’re looking for.
• Set up alerts on any search topics you choose.

Already a part of the community? Sign In Now.

Is one article a month not enough? Subscribe today to unlock premium access to all the in-depth analysis and breaking news on critical legal issues from Law.com.

*May exclude premium content.

Continue Reading

The panel asked what affect the justices' rulings in United States v. Skrmetti and Medina v. Planned Parenthood have in a challenge to a West Virginia policy excluding "transsexual surgeries" from Medicaid coverage.

"The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in an unsigned order allowing...

Read Full Story: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi1AFBVV95cUxPRG5YeEVIZF8tdkhiby1NZkJM...