Hospitality businesses are facing growing legal exposure over service charges as courts, regulators and consumers increasingly scrutinize whether mandatory fees are clearly disclosed, properly characterized and consistently applied.
Service charges were never intended to become one of the hospitality industry's most litigated issues. For decades, hotels, restaurants, caterers and event operators have relied on mandatory service charges--particularly in banquet and group settings--to standardize pricing, offset labor costs and reduce the uncertainty inherent in discretionary tipping. What began as an operational convenience has evolved into a significant source of legal risk.
Today, service charges are at the center of a growing wave of litigation driven by regulators, plaintiffs' attorneys, and increasingly, consumer expectations regarding pricing transparency. The central question is deceptively simple: What is the customer paying for, and who ultimately receives the money? The answer is often less straightforward than operators believe.
Service charge or gratuity?
The distinction between a service charge and a gratuity carries significant legal consequences.
California Labor Code section 351 prohibits employers from collecting or retaining any gratuity that a patron leaves for or gives to an employee. By contrast, a mandatory service charge is not automatically considered a gratuity simply because it appears on a customer's bill.
The analysis instead turns largely on...
A viral Facebook post falsely claimed that a fire broke out at the San Francisco 49ers' Levi’s Stadium. A viral Facebook post claiming that Levi’s Stadium, home of the San Francisco 49ers, caught f...