A federal appeals court has sided with Starbucks in a dispute over employee clothing and union organizing, finding that the National Labor Relations Board did not properly weigh the company's dress standards against employees' protected activity, according to Reuters.
The case centers on a Starbucks location in Manhattan where employees wore union-related clothing that did not comply with the store's dress requirements. Starbucks had restricted what workers could wear there based on the store's appearance standards. The location was also among the first Starbucks stores to unionize.
The NLRB ruled in 2024 that Starbucks had unlawfully restricted union apparel. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reached a different conclusion and sent the case back to the labor board. The NLRB will have to take another look at the dispute.
Restaurant operators commonly set rules around uniforms, logos and other aspects of employee appearance. Those rules can become more complicated when employees are engaged in union organizing or other activity protected under federal labor law.
Starbucks now has more than 700 unionized stores, Reuters reports. The dispute involved a Manhattan flagship location with its own dress requirements.
The case also follows recent disputes involving employee dress rules at Home Depot and Tesla, where courts likewise sided with employers seeking to enforce workplace appearance policies.
While Starbucks is not a franchise, the decision could point to implications...
Police recommend charges against Kim Sae-ron’s mother and family lawyer over false claims Police have referred several more people to prosecutors in the legal battle surrounding actor Kim Soo-hyun,...