The Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal from Molina Healthcare that would have ended a False Claims Act lawsuit brought by a former business partner and could have raised the bar for future whistleblower cases.
The high court’s decision Tuesday clears the way for a whistleblower to pursue his allegations that the Medicaid insurer charged Illinois and the federal government for nursing home services it didn't provide.
Molina asked the court to review a lower court decision in February, arguing the whistleblower's complaint lacked sufficient detail to meet the legal standard required for False Claims Act suits. If the Supreme Court had taken up the case, it would “have serious impact on the burden of litigation” required for such complaints and created a new precedent, according to a court order published in June.
The Supreme Court did not provide an explanation for its decision not to hear the case. Molina did not immediately respond to an interview request.
A provider group filed the lawsuit in 2017 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and alleged that Molina misrepresented the performance of its skilled nursing facility services contract to increase the revenue it generated from the Illinois Medicaid program.
Thomas Prose, CEO of a Novi, Michigan-based post-acute medical practice called General Medicine, alleges that Molina billed Medicaid for physician and nurse practitioner visits that didn't occur. General Medicine clinicians...
Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP advises e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE: ELF) investors that the firm is investigating potential legal claims arising from alleged false statements about the strength ...