On February 18, 2022, in LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 2022 WL 498847 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2022), the California Court of Appeal (2nd District) ruled in a published decision that there is no right to a jury trial in claims brought under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The question was one of first impression for the Court of Appeal, which was “surprised that it took so long for the jury trial issue to present itself for appellate review.” Id. at *2 n.6.
Under California law, a right to a jury trial derives either from the California Constitution or from statute. Because PAGA does not include any provision providing for a jury trial, the court analyzed whether the state constitution provided such a right. In doing so, it examined “the gist of the action” to determine whether it was similar to the “common law actions at law that were triable by a jury in 1850,” when the right to a jury trial was enshrined in the California Constitution. Id. at *3.
For three main reasons, the Court determined that a PAGA action was not the type of action that would have been triable to a jury under the common law. First, although actions for civil penalties are usually actions at law, a PAGA claim “would otherwise be an administrative regulatory enforcement action,” which would occur without the benefit of a jury. Id. at *7. It would be “anomalous to vest the state’s proxies with more rights than the state would otherwise have on its own.” Id.
Second, courts have broad...
NEWS Spurred by netizens, a domestic investigation found that the company’s listed overseas production address was linked to an unrelated Australian auto shop. A top-selling Chinese health suppleme...