For over 160 years, the False Claims Act has let people bring claims on behalf of the U.S. government alleging fraud. In exchange, those individuals receive a portion of any recovery. In September, a federal district judge found unconstitutional the FCA’s qui tam provision.
In a new article in the New York Law Journal, Orrick’s Joseph Walker, David Rhinesmith, Daniel R. Alonso and Hillary Dang explore the decision – and its implications for FCA enforcement.
Originally published in the December 9, 2024 edition of the New York Law Journal.
Read Full Story:
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiggFBVV95cUxQdnZJZnl6a3BKNGw5S3NUb3pK...