Three key pieces of legislation, AB 199, SB 848, and SB 241 are shaping the future of remote court proceedings in California.
Remote court proceedings are no longer viewed as merely temporary pandemic-induced measures in California. They have become part of everyday litigation practice. A report to the California Judicial Council pushing for increased use of remote technology emphasizes that courts, lawyers, and clients benefit from remote access. The report notes that remote proceedings remove barriers to in-person participation for court users, “such as job constraints, lost income from work, childcare needs, transportation issues, traffic congestion in urban areas, and length of travel for rural communities.” On the other hand, concerns raised include “challenges providing adequate interpreting services when they [are] not physically present with the court user” and some lawyers’ “desire to be physically present with their client to ensure that clients fully understand the court proceedings.”
In June of this year, the Legislature enacted AB 199, which authorizes the use of remote proceedings in criminal matters but maintains the court’s right to require the physical presence of any defendant in a felony proceeding. In misdemeanor cases, the accused may appear remotely for everything except a trial. In felony cases, the same rule applies, but the court may waive the accused’s presence for portions of trial where their presence is not necessary.
In 2021, the Legislature...
Kyiv claims that there was no agreement between the two sides not to disclose that North Korean POWs had been transferred from Ukraine to South Korea The Blue House demanded a formal explanation an...